Wednesday, February 19, 2020

Reducing mental health recidivism in corectional facilities Article

Reducing mental health recidivism in corectional facilities - Article Example The research revealed that mental illness treatment and employment services are the most effective methods that can be used to reduce mental health recidivism in correctional facilities. Introduction Mental health recidivism refers to the relapse of a prisoner’s mental health due to provision of improper rehabilitation services. Criminals, who do not receive proper mental health treatment during imprisonment, show a higher degree of recidivism as compared to the prisoners who receive proper rehabilitation services. Rate of recidivism is the degree to which criminals come back to prison either for the same offense or for some other criminal offense. A higher rate of recidivism indicates lack of rehabilitation services for prisoners because of which they cannot stop themselves from relapsing into criminal activities upon release from the prisons. It also increases government expenses in terms of incarceration and trial expenses, as well as causes threat to the overall peace of s ociety. On the other hand, a lower degree of mental health recidivism indicates presence of a proper correctional management system which performs its role efficiently to improve the negative mindset of criminals. A number of mental health recidivism-reduction methods are available which can help correctional officers reduce the rate of recidivism among prison inmates. Some of those methods include educational programs, employment programs, treatment programs, parole based programs, and faith based programs. However, mental illness treatment and employment programs work best for reducing mental health recidivism rates. In this paper, we will examine the extent to which mental illness treatment and employment programs help prisoners recover from mental illness and serve the society as normal citizens. We will review existing literature to gather detailed information. Methodology We used questionnaires and personal interviews to determine the role of mental illness treatment and emplo yment programs in reducing the rate of mental health recidivism. We interviewed ten correctional officers and twenty-five prisoners from three different prisons to gather information about the current rate of recidivism and the types of rehabilitation services that are provided to prisoners. The questionnaire was able to obtain relevant information about the past imprisonment histories of the prisoners. The prisons visited for research included Albion Correctional Facility, Bare Hill Correctional Facility, and Buffalo Correctional Facility. All of these prisons are located in New York. Results The results of the research indicated that rehabilitation services being provided to prisoners in these prisons are not up to the standards. The recidivism reduction programs implemented in Albion Correctional Facility and Bare Hill Correctional Facility include treatment for substance abuse, treatment for mental illness, and employment programs. On the other hand, the recidivism reduction tec hniques being used in Buffalo Correctional Facility include employment and educational programs. One-third of the mentally ill prisoners revealed that they have been imprisoned for more than two times in their lives. They said that correctional officers do not give proper attention to the needs of mentally

Tuesday, February 4, 2020

EU Competition Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 4250 words

EU Competition Law - Essay Example These cartels have negative impacts and it has been made illegal under EU rules on competition. The EU Courts to such cartel firms can impose heavy fines.  The pursuit of EU competition laws has been huge but there has been doubting as to the exact goals of their laws. Comparison of laws in the decentralized EU competition enforcement with other national laws on competition reveals parallel pursuits in its application. This essay analyses an overview of competition laws by the EU and its members and looks into detail the enforcement system of the EU competition law and any inconsistencies noted in the application of the rules. It also analyzes duties of such authorities when matters of enforcement of Section 101 and 102 of the TFEU are to be affected. According to Ezrachi, 1competition law is very important to the European community and its organs. Its core platform of EU is to facilitate the industry. The industry due to its competitive nature provides advantages for people involv ed and ensures proper functioning of its market and the European industry. Therefore, the EU nature must protect effective protection of such competition.The EU fosters obligatory requirement for member states to embrace converged forms of substantive procedures for enforcement of such laws. This has always posed a major challenge in the realization of unified competition laws. National laws on competition are radical towards the creation of right policies on competition regulations. These laws have been regarded as relevant for publicity of the Commission in creating effective policies. Power 2 explains that total reliance on the commission for effective enforcement of national procedures and its institutions has created the absence of clarity in the goals of its laws.EU competition law drafters lacked a clear focus on its goals since they failed to think of the best enforcement regime. These laws lack procedures for uniform practices to all members states.